Annemarie O. v. United Healthcare Ins. Co.

  • About Us
    • Our Approach
    • Our Mission
    • Parity Leadership Group
  • Parity Reports
    • Federal Report
    • State Reports
  • Know Your Rights
    • Common Violations
    • Glossary
    • Solution
    • What is Parity?
  • Resources
    • Parity Advocacy Resources
    • Consumer Resources
    • State Parity Enforcement Actions
    • Milliman Report Overview
    • Issue Briefs
    • Legal Cases
    • 2018 State Parity Statutes Report

Annemarie O. v. United Healthcare Ins. Co. (U.S. Dist. Ct. for the Dist. of Utah, case no. 1:20-CV-164 TS,  June 21, 2021). Judge Ted Stewart denied Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss because Plaintiff’s met the three basic elements of a Parity Act Claim i.e. i) treatment limitation likely used with a focus on MH/SUD acute criteria, ii) medical/surgical analogue referenced such as skilled nursing, and iii) a disparity was asserted in terms of how care was covered between MH/SUD and medical/surgical services).

Website enhancements in progress made possible by

Content Disclaimer: Parity Track is a collaborative forum that works to aggregate and elevate the parity implementation work taking place across the country. The content of this website is always evolving. If you are aware of other parity-related work that is not represented on this website, please contact us so that we can continue to improve this website.

Presented by The Kennedy Forum Scattergood Foundation