Doe v. United Behavioral Health and United Healthcare Services

  • About Us
    • Our Approach
    • Our Mission
    • Parity Leadership Group
  • Parity Reports
    • Federal Report
    • State Reports
  • Know Your Rights
    • Common Violations
    • Glossary
    • Solution
    • What is Parity?
  • Resources
    • Parity Advocacy Resources
    • Consumer Resources
    • State Parity Enforcement Actions
    • Milliman Report Overview
    • Issue Briefs
    • Legal Cases
    • 2018 State Parity Statutes Report
  • Filed in U.S. District Court of Northern District of California, San Francisco Division on November 7, 2019).
  • The class-action complaint alleges that United improperly excludes coverage for Intensive Behavioral Therapies (“IBT”), including Applied Behavior Analysis for Autism treatment. The complaint asserts that defendants’ exclusion violates the Federal Parity Law and breaches their fiduciary duties under ERISA.

Website enhancements in progress made possible by

Content Disclaimer: Parity Track is a collaborative forum that works to aggregate and elevate the parity implementation work taking place across the country. The content of this website is always evolving. If you are aware of other parity-related work that is not represented on this website, please contact us so that we can continue to improve this website.

Presented by The Kennedy Forum Scattergood Foundation